Math problems from the *free* official practice tests and
problems from mba.com
joehurundas
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:22 pm
 

is xy > 0 ?

by joehurundas Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:03 am

Is xy > 0 ?
(1) x - y > -2
(2) x - 2y < -6
purnendu.shukla
Students
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:26 pm
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by purnendu.shukla Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:34 pm

I think answer is "C"
combining A&B y>4
which -> x>2 so xy>0 suff
vivekcall81
Students
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:04 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by vivekcall81 Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:28 am

C cannot be the answer if you x=3 and y=5
yes XY>0 but out it in to the equation
x-y=3-5=-2 which is equal but not .-2
hence not satisfied and E should be the answer.
adiagr
Students
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:47 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by adiagr Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:24 am

vivekcall81 Wrote:C cannot be the answer if you x=3 and y=5
yes XY>0 but out it in to the equation
x-y=3-5=-2 which is equal but not .-2
hence not satisfied and E should be the answer.


Vivek,

Given (1) and (2), we have to see whether xy>0.

Now x=3, y=5

x-y=-2, which means that (1) itself is not satisfied. so you cannot take this pair at all.

From (1) and (2) together

y>4 and x>2........so xy>0.

It appears Ans is C.
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by RonPurewal Mon Jul 05, 2010 4:54 am

Vivek,

Given (1) and (2), we have to see whether xy>0.

Now x=3, y=5

x-y=-2, which means that (1) itself is not satisfied. so you cannot take this pair at all.


yes.

@ vivek, at this point i would recommend a careful study of the first principles of data sufficiency -- it appears that you are still a bit hazy on how the data sufficiency problems work. without that sort of baseline understanding, you shouldn't advance to solving problems like this one yet.

--

for any other readers reading this thread, the key to solving the statements together is the usual key to combining inequalities: IF THE INEQUALITIES ARE BOTH ">" OR BOTH "<", YOU CAN ADD THEM TOGETHER.

the original versions of statements 1 and 2 have opposite inequality signs, so multiply the second one by -1 in order to achieve ">" on both:

(1) x - y > -2
(2) 2y - x > 6

then add these together, to give y > 4. the rest of the solution is as posted above by other users.
joehurundas
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:22 pm
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by joehurundas Mon Jul 05, 2010 5:39 pm

thanks all for your contributions to solving the problem; the trick, as explained by RonPurewal, lies in reversing the sign before addition.
OA is C
mschwrtz
ManhattanGMAT Staff
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:03 pm
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by mschwrtz Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:58 am

glad Ron (et alia) could help
jigar24
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:17 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by jigar24 Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:12 am

Hi Ron, but could you be more clear on how to eliminate 'B' first?.. I am able to eliminate 'A' (and so also 'D') easily but getting stuck on eliminating 'B' (only statement 2 alone is sufficient).
Thanks

My approach:

In order for xy>0 both x and y either have to positive or both negative.. So, I tired to come up with numbers 1) both with same signs 2) Both with different signs .. if both these type work in a statement then it implies given statement is NOT sufficient..

In the process, I could very easily prove statement 1 insufficient but getting stuck (and taking an eternity) on statement 2 ... cant come up with examples fast enough..

Please help
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by RonPurewal Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:41 am

jigar24 Wrote:Hi Ron, but could you be more clear on how to eliminate 'B' first?.. I am able to eliminate 'A' (and so also 'D') easily but getting stuck on eliminating 'B' (only statement 2 alone is sufficient).
Thanks

My approach:

In order for xy>0 both x and y either have to positive or both negative.. So, I tired to come up with  numbers 1) both with same signs  2) Both with different signs .. if both these type work in a statement then it implies given statement is NOT sufficient.. 

In the process, I could very easily prove statement 1 insufficient but  getting stuck (and taking an eternity) on statement 2 ... cant come up with examples fast enough..

Please help


this task is a lot easier if you solve the inequality for one of the variables, i.e., x < -6 + 2y.  now, if you plug in something like 10 for y, you get x < 14, for which all three signs (positive, negative, and zero) are possible.  so, insufficient.

alternatively, if you don't think of solving the original inequality for x, just find a solution in which both numbers are positive (say, 10 and 10), and then realize that you can just make one of the numbers 0.  that's good enough, since 0 > 0 is false.

TAKEAWAY:
there are three signs, not just two; positive, negative, and zero.
don't forget that zero is a sign!
jigar24
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:17 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by jigar24 Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:31 am

Ron, I understood the first part that you mentioned.. That will surely make life much easier.. One has to try to get +ve value on the right hand side of '<' sign and a -ve value on the right hand side of '>' sign, in order to include all three signs and prove the statement insufficient.. Right??

However, I am still a bit unclear about your second explanation:

"alternatively, if you don't think of solving the original inequality for x, just find a solution in which both numbers are positive (say, 10 and 10), and then realize that you can just make one of the numbers 0. that's good enough, since 0 > 0 is false."

Could you please explain this once more, with an example??
Last edited by jigar24 on Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
jigar24
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:17 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by jigar24 Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:36 am

Thanks
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: is xy > 0 ?

by RonPurewal Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:32 am

jigar24 Wrote:Ron, I understood the first part that you mentioned.. That will surely make life much easier.. One has to try to get +ve value on the right hand side of '<' sign and a -ve value on the right hand side of '>' sign, in order to include all three signs and prove the statement insufficient.. Right??

However, I am still a bit unclear about your second explanation:

"alternatively, if you don't think of solving the original inequality for x, just find a solution in which both numbers are positive (say, 10 and 10), and then realize that you can just make one of the numbers 0. that's good enough, since 0 > 0 is false."

Could you please explain this once more, with an example??


there's already an example in there.

if x = 10 and y = 10, then statement 2 is satisfied, and the answer to the prompt question is "YES; xy > 0".

now we need a NO (this is how number-plugging on data sufficiency works; you want to try to prove "insufficient", since further YES's won't help you).
one easy way to get a NO will be to set one of x or y to 0, since 0 is not greater than 0.
so, say, x = 0, and y = 10. then statement 2 is true again, but, NO, xy is not > 0 this time.

therefore, insufficient.

--

GRAPHICAL SOLUTION

if you know what the graphs of these inequalities look like -- they're shaded on one side of a straight line -- then you'll know that any such inequality will have to shade in at least two neighboring quadrants.
however, in any 2 neighboring quadrants, xy will have opposite signs; so we actually know that this statement is insufficient for ANY inequality of the form Ax + By < C or Ax + By > C.

cool stuff.