Another thread that's getting lots of commentary - excellent!
According to GMAC (the people who make the real test and GMATPrep), the algorithm is the same. So the scoring system is the same, yes, although I
believe (I'm not sure) that there are not as many questions in the GMATPrep database, which
could have the effect of making the scores a little bit less precise.
But do you know that the real test has a standard deviation of about 30 points? In other words, even the real test is not as precise as lots of people assume it is. (And that's not a knock against the GMAT - all tests of this nature have a standard deviation. There are too many variables affecting things for there not to be some varability in how people perform from day to day.)
Next, updesh_d, you describe your performance on the two tests based upon the number that you got right / wrong and then ask:
Why did i receive a better mark in GMATPrep 2?
Because you earned it. The test is not scored based upon # right or # wrong. If you'd like to learn more about how the test is scored, you can read the Scoring section of our free e-book The GMAT Uncovered Guide (if you have an account with us, it's already in your account!). Or you can just take my word for it: someone can get more right and get a lower score; someone can get more wrong and get a higher score. The test is not scored in the way that you're used to tests being scored. :)
One thing to note for future: leaving a question blank results in a higher penalty than answering a question but answering it incorrectly.
Sunil, thanks for linking to that article! You beat me to it - I would've posted it too. And, hey, we have it up on our own site now, here:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... anagement/