by RonPurewal Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:42 am
yeah, this isn't the right question. none of these choices should have an equals sign in it; they should all be "<".
(by the way, it's easy to type "<"; just type "<" with an underline. this is better for our readers; no matter how hard i try, for instance, i can't help seeing "<=" as an arrow pointing to the left.)
moty has the right idea in the post above:
when you have a 3-sided "sandwich" inequality with the variable only in the middle, such as that in choice (e) of this problem, then you can operate on all 3 sides of the inequality at once.
so, as moty did, you can subtract 4 from all three sides of the inequality, and then divide all three sides of the inequality by 3.
if there are variables on two, or all three, sides of the inequality, though, you can't do this anymore; you have to separate the inequality into two separate, "normal", two-sided inequalities and solve them separately.
for instance, if you have 2x - 3 < x + 1 < 3x - 1, it's impossible to operate on all three sides at once, so you split it up into left- and right-hand inequalities:
2x - 3 < x + 1 --> solve: x < 4
x + 1 < 3x - 1 --> solve: 2 < 2x -> 1 < x
combining these gives the ultimate solution, which is 1 < x < 4.
--
the solution to the correct version of (a), x^4 < 1, is -1 < x < 1.
the solution to the correct version of (c), x^2 < 16, is -4 < x < 4.
there are two ways to get these solutions:
(1) MEMORIZE their general form.
this is probably what you should do if you don't like wasting time.
whenever you have an INEQUALITY INVOLVING AN EVEN POWER, such as the ones in choices (a) and (c), you should know that your solution is going to contain both positive and negative roots of the number that appears in the inequality.
if you see x^2 < 16, for instance, the solution is -4 < x < 4.
if you see x^2 > 16, the solution is x > 4 OR x < -4. (there's no way to write this is a "sandwich" inequality.)
(2) use the fact that √(x^2) = |x| (and its equivalents for 4th, 6th, ... powers).
this is an extra step, and is sort of pointless - i.e., it will just yield the same result as the aforementioned memorization, but at greater effort - but, if you're the type who absolutely must know the justification for everything, then you can use this.
for instance,
x^2 < 16
take √ of both sides --> |x| < 4
solve (probably via prior memorization) --> -4 < x < 4
etc.
i'm not going to address the second question, because the forum policy is to post each problem in a separate thread.
please post the second problem in a separate thread.
thanks.
you're also supposed to use a title consisting of the first several words of the problem statement, too.