The original problem (challenge problem 06/05/2006) does not contain any additional constraints, other than the stated constraint of: "
If a is nonnegative"
mschwrtz Wrote:BUT...are you sure that the original problem did not contain any constraints on x and y?
I have a follow up question regarding this problem:
I have retraced the solution step numerous times, but I must be missing something simple. I understand the part I highlighted in
Red to say that since x^2 + y^2 is the sum of squares, and squares are never negative, then the sum must be positive, as a result the 9a must be positive, as 9a = x^2 + y^2. Please stop me here, if I am offtrack.
I get lost at the next statement, which I highlighted in
blue.
Is the '
inequality', referenced in the solution below, the question stem "(x^2 + y^2 > 4a)" and the
previous equation, referenced below, statement (1). I have highlighted statement (1) in
Red?
- If these are not the areas being referenced by the solution statement, then which inequality/statement are being referred to in the solution?
- If these are the items being referenced
(a) how can we include the question stem in the proof?
(b) How do we arrive at 2(x^2 + y^2) >= 9a
MGMAT Solution(1) INSUFFICIENT: If we multiply this equation out, we get:
x^2 + 2xy + y^2 = 9a
If we try to solve this expression for x^2 + y^2, we get
x^2 + y^2 = 9a - 2xy
Since the value of this expression depends on the value of x and y, we don't seem to have enough information.
As a subtlety, we do know that
x^2 + y^2 >= 2xy
in all cases, because x^2 + y^2 - 2xy = (x - y)^2, which must be non-negative. Thus, if we add this inequality to the previous equation, we get the following:
2(x^2 + y^2) >= 9awhich means
x^2 + y^2 >= 4.5a
And thus, the question can be rephrased as follows:
Is an expression at least as big as 4.5a greater than 4a?
The answer is Yes, if we know a is positive. However, a could be 0, in which case the answer would be Maybe.