ghag.kamlesh Wrote:if I consider 'x' as decimal, then answer is different, and if 'x' is integer as per solution given, then answer is different.
this is false. if this were true, then the problem would not be a valid problem, as there would be more than one "correct" answer.
i'm curious --
what decimal value did you think gave an answer besides (D)?
whatever that value was, you must have made some error in your arithmetic, because (x + 2) is still the biggest of these expressions.
--
if you want a proof, here's a proof. (NOTE: if you are actually going through this kind of mental gymnastics when you're taking the test, then you should really get on methods like "plug in your own numbers".)
* (A) x is clearly smaller than (C) 2x. eliminate (A).
* (B) x^2 is x times x.
since x is less than 2, x times x must be less than 2 times x.
so, (B) is smaller than (C). eliminate (B).
* (C) 2x is x + x.
(D) is x + 2. again, we know that x is less than 2, so (D) must be bigger. eliminate (C).
* (E) is not as easy to prove; I don't know if there is an algebraic way to prove this (without using things that are beyond what the gmat actually tests).
if you know what the graphs look like, then you'll know that (D) x + 2 is a straight line, while (E) 2^x is curved upward.
since both (D) and (E) are equal to 4 when x = 2, it follows that the straight line is on top for smaller values. (try drawing the line and the curve if you don't see why this is so.)
other than that, you pretty much just have to plug in numbers and see what happens.
if x is anything between 0 and 1, then 2^x is less than 2, but x + 2 is more than 2.
for the other values, just try enough to see what the deal is: e.g., if x = 1.5, then 2^x is 2√2 = approximately 2.8, while x + 2 is substantially bigger (3.5).
again,
all of this is unnecessary.
THE POINT of this problem, especially choice (E) (which can't be easily resolved with textbook methods),
is for you to REALIZE that you only need to plug in ONE VALUE.