krisp2 Wrote:Hi,
I am looking for a study plan with 3 months to take GMAT. I am looking for ways to study/take practice tests to maximize my scores. I got OG11, MGMAT SC and RC guides. I can dedicate up to 15 hours/week.
Following is my plan,
1. Review OG Quant, MGMAT SC and RC guides (1 week)
2. Take diagnostic tests and study problem areas (2 days)
3. Take GmatPrep test 1 (1 day)
4. Do OG 11 (3 weeks)
4. Take practice tests (1 a week) and review (duration 6 weeks)
5. Take GmatPrep test before the real test
Does this make sense? Are eight practice tests enough? How and when do I know if I need any additional training (such as taking MGMAT class?)
Regards,
Kris
ok, whoa there.
* first of all, you've got these things in a strict sequence - that's never a good thing, especially with the official guide questions.
see, there should be a "feedback loop" between the official guide questions and the practice tests: the OG questions will prepare you for the practice tests, and then the practice tests, in turn, will show you which questions you should do MORE of in the OG's.
* you probably shouldn't load up on practice tests too early, unless you think you're almost done with learning content. the fact that you plan to take 3 practice tests in 3 days, at the very beginning of your program, is a bit worrisome,
unless the prime emphasis of those practice tests is to be time management. as far as an initial diagnostic, if i were you, i wouldn't do more than one practice test - two at the absolute most. you should save the others for after you've had more practice.
don't forget to emphasize time management ALL the time. i.e., if you are
ever solving a problem with five multiple choices, you should be timing the problem, and you should be stopping
second:
where are your scores?
if you are not already scoring 700 plus, then you are planning WAY too little time for the OG and for the quant OG. you seem to think that one week is enough time to go through the ENTIRE quant OG (in addition to two other books!), and you also seem to think that three weeks is enough time to go through the ENTIRE normal OG.
this isn't good. this seems to betray an attitude that you should just "do" the OG by going through problem after problem after problem, just smiling and moving on if you get the problem right, and just seeing what mistakes you made if you get the problem wrong.
that method is, in fact, close to useless when it comes to actually studying for the exam. after all, you're not going to see those actual problems again, so, focusing on
those problems will mostly just waste your time.
instead, you need to REVIEW ALL PROBLEMS - including problems that you got right - for GENERAL LESSONS ("takeaways") that you could conceivably APPLY TO OTHER PROBLEMS.
i posted a long post about this
here.
the fact that you allotted 6 weeks for the review of your practice tests, but only 4 weeks for the OG and quant OG
combined (including time for other books), shows that you don't plan to review the OG problems very heavily. unless you're already at the 700-plus level - in which case the vast majority of problems in the OG's won't be hard for you at all - you should be reviewing
those problems AT THE SAME DEPTH as you're reviewing the practice-test problems. see the link above for how.
* make sure you have an ABSOLUTELY SOLID understanding of what "review" fully entails before taking on any of these review responsibilities.
* finally:
are you mostly studying quant? i.e., why the OG and the quant OG, but not the verbal OG?
what are your current scores?
what are your current areas of greatest strength and greatest weakness?
good luck.
good luck.