Okay, first I'm going to make comments based on what I see in the data myself as I go down your data for the first test you posted (#2). Then I'll comment on your overall analysis.
Quant.
For your 4 in a row wrong, you spent too much time on 2 that were really too hard for you - so of course you got them wrong - and then you had to guess on the next two because you were running out of time. Conclusion: spending extra time (>2.5m on quant) is NOT worth it, because the whole point is that you only need that much extra time when the question is too hard in the first place.
My guess is that this pattern didn't show up only at the end. There were other times where you spend too much time / didn't cut yourself off, and then you had to rush to make up the time, likely leading to some careless mistakes.
Just got to your next bit. Yep; confirms what I said above.
Next, timing. WAY too fast on sub-700 level quant questions. Too slow on incorrect - losing an average of 30 seconds per incorrect problem. And, of course, we know that those averages mask a lot of questions that were too long, leaving you with other questions that were way too fast.
Linear eqns: 2 right but avg 2:41. Learn shortcuts.
Geometry is both low and slow; very weak area, needs work. At the very least, cut yourself off faster.
Number Props also too low - but at least these are too fast, not too slow. Reallocate time here, get the averages up to 2m, you might have a shot at raising this percentage. Priorities: divis and primes, odds and evens, pos and neg.
Word probs excellent EXCEPT you're still spending too much time on INcorrect problems. Cut yourself off faster. That's the theme throughout.
Verbal.
Strong performance overall.
Most of the too-slow questions were SC. Why do you think that is? Do you eliminate 2-3 options relatively quickly but then spend too much time agonizing between the final 2 or 3 options? If so, then you need to learn to streamline your SC process.
On your 1st pass through answers: place answers into 1 of 2 categories, definitely wrong or maybe. DO NOT decide whether something is right at this stage.
On your 2nd pass through the answers: look only at the "maybe" answers, compare, choose one. When you are down to two answers on verbal, look at each answer ONCE more, then pick one and move on. Do NOT spend time agonizing back and forth between 2 (or more) answers.
Or do you get slowed down when you have a very convoluted sentence, with a long underline and some meaning issues going on (the ones where you read the original sentence and you think: what? I don't even understand what they're trying to say). If so, then you need to learn how to tackle meaning-based and convoluted SCs:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... orrection/RC and CR are awfully fast, and yet you're still getting most of them right. That's awesome - but make sure that you don't make yourself go so quickly that you make a bunch of careless mistakes. Be anal and systematic. :)
SC is a lot slower, but you're getting away with it because of your speed on CR and RC. Have you really streamlined things as much as you can? (As I mentioned, for example, never agonize back and forth multiple times between two verbal answers - whatever your first instinct was is probably what you'll pick by the time you do pick an answer, so you might as well just do that sooner!)
My point with this is: your percentage correct is about the same across all of verbal, but you're rushing on CR and RC while spending more time than usual on SC. That tells me CR and RC are big strengths of yours - yet the percentage correct is about the same as it is for SC. So maybe that extra time spent on SC is not the best place to spend that time, because maybe CR and RC could be even better with normal time.
In particular, if the extra time on SC can be saved without sacrificing your current accuracy, then win-win!
More data - okay, your slow on modifiers, meaning, parallelism, and comparisons, which tells me you're slower on the more convoluted sentences without such obvious splits. See the article I linked above, a few paragraphs back.
Overall analysis:
Yes, in general, you have timing problems on quant. Read these two articles and start doing what they say:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... to-win-it/http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... nt-part-1/Of your "pain areas" for quant, these are the most important: inequalities, number properties, fractions.
RC. I should probably go back to the passage and verify the answer before confirming.
Ding ding ding! (Bells going off. :) Yes, be anal and systematic. Don't just trust your memory. Verify!
Quant is going to take more of your focus than verbal, obviously, but there are still things that you can do on verbal in order to increase the chances that you'll be able to maintain that great performance on real test day. The two big things will be making sure that you aren't losing time on SC to activities that aren't really helping you anyway, and being very systematic on CR and RC to minimize careless mistakes.
For SC, see that article I linked above re: convoluted sentences that test meaning. You also mention struggling with certain CR questions; here are some resources:
overall process:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... g-problem/infer / draw concl:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... e-Problem/weaken:
http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index ... n-problem/describe role / boldface:
http://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/02/ ... ce-problemFinally, I was about to link another article but I just realized I already gave it to you in my last post. The very last article I linked (studying for and struggling with the gmat) - go take a look at that, in particular the "how to study" section. That, coupled with the timing articles above, will give you your overall study platform. (And, of course, come back here with questions!)