Hi,
I am hoping someone can help explain this too me because I don't agree with the answer given. The question is from the Critical Reasoning strategy guide 6th edition, Chapter 3 Question 4:
In an attempt to explain the cause of malaria, a deadly infectious disease, early European settlers in Hong Kong attributed the malady to poisonous gases supposedly emanating from low-lying swampland. In the 1880's, however, doctors determined that Anopheles mosquitoes were responsible for transmitting the disease to humans after observing that the female of the species can carry a parasitic protozoan that is passed on to unsuspecting humans when a mosquito feasts on a person's blood.
What function does the statement in boldface fulfill with respect to the argument presented above?
I was stuck between A and C. Answer A is the correct answer.
(A) It provides support for the explanation of a particular phenomenon.
(C) It offers confirmation of a contested assumption.
I understand that the boldface is evidence or support for the conclusion, so a premise. What I don't understand is why the explanation is saying nothing is contested when it clearly states that the first assumption that Hong Kong made was opposed/contested by the conclusion that malaria was transmitted by mosquitos, specifically females.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks.