Verbal question you found somewhere else? General issue with idioms or grammar? Random verbal question? These questions belong here.
rico16rad
Students
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:27 am
 

CR : Logging industry official

by rico16rad Tue Oct 20, 2009 3:03 am

Source : LSAT Question Bank .1000CR

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.



Y the answer can't be E
Expert please answer the above question.
B defines about the product not the about the control of CO2
RonPurewal
Students
 
Posts: 19744
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:23 am
 

Re: CR : Logging industry official

by RonPurewal Sat Nov 28, 2009 4:40 am

rico16rad Wrote:Source : LSAT Question Bank .1000CR

Logging industry official: Harvesting trees from old-growth forests for use in manufacture can reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, since when large old trees die in the forest they decompose, releasing their stored carbon dioxide. Harvesting old-growth forests would, moreover, make room for rapidly growing young trees, which absorb more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than do trees in old-growth forests.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the official’s argument?
(A) Many old-growth forests are the home of thousands of animal species that would be endangered if the forests were to be destroyed.
(B) Much of the organic matter from old-growth trees, unusable as lumber, is made into products that decompose rapidly.
(C) A young tree contains less than half the amount of carbon dioxide that is stored in an old tree of the same species.
(D) Much of the carbon dioxide present in forests is eventually released when wood and other organic debris found on the forest floor decompose.
(E) It can take many years for the trees of a newly planted forest to reach the size of those found in existing old-growth forests.



Y the answer can't be E
Expert please answer the above question.
B defines about the product not the about the control of CO2


(e) actually STRENGTHENS the argument.

the passage says that young trees absorb more co2 than do old trees. choice (e), basically, is saying that "young" trees take a long, long, long time to become "old" trees - so that they have increased potential for absorbing co2.

(b) says that many of the products will decompose quickly. according to the information in the passage, this means that they will thereby cause co2 to be released.
since the passage's ultimate conclusion is that the harvesting will cause the LOWERING of co2, this weakens the argument.

finally, please type "why" instead of "Y", so that all of our posters can understand your message. thank you.