by Chris (MGMAT) Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:28 am
The president of the block association tried to convince her neighbors they should join forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood rather than continuing to be victimized.
(A) they should join forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood rather than continuing to be victimized
(B) that they should join forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood rather than continue to be victimized
(C) about joining forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood instead of continuing to be victimized
(D) for the joining of forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood rather than continue to be victimized
(E) to join forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood rather than continuing to be victimized
There are two logically parallel sentence elements that should be treated as structurally parallel:
1. join forces to prevent crime in the neighborhood
rather than (which compares the two elements)
2. continuing to be victimized
These two phrases, as they are presented as logically parallel should be kept structurally parallel, with the primary determinant of parallelism being the verb form ('join' and 'continue'). In the example above, 'join' and 'continuing' are not parallel, so you should eliminate (A). The same issue also brings us to eliminate both (D) and (E).
Answer choice (C) is parallel in terms of the verb form, but there is no reason to use the more complex '-ing' form of both verbs. Also, 'convince her neighbors about joining' is awkward.
The correct answer, answer choice (B) is parallel, and the construction 'convince her neighbors THAT' is correct.
I hope that this is helpful. - Chris Ryan