by StaceyKoprince Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:15 pm
Yes, you learn from reviewing the problems. The amount you learn depends upon the depth of review you are doing. Reading / understanding the explanation is only the first (of many) steps. :)
For instance, can you answer these questions about all of the problems you do (including the ones you get right):
Was I able to CATEGORIZE this question by topic and subtopic? By process / technique?
Did I make a CONNECTION to previous experience? Or did I have to do it all from scratch?
Did I COMPREHEND the symbols, text, questions, statements, and answer choices?
Did I understand the CONTENT being tested?
Did I choose the best APPROACH?
Did I have the SKILLS to follow through?
Am I comfortable with OTHER STRATEGIES that would have worked, at least partially? How should I have made an educated guess?
Do I understand every TRAP & TRICK that the writer built into the question, including wrong answers?
Have I MASTERED this problem? Could I explain every aspect, fully, to someone else?
How will I RECOGNIZE similar problems in the future?
If I made a mistake:
- WHY did I make the mistake (as explicitly as possible)?
- What habit(s) do I need to break and what habit(s) do I need to instill in order to minimize the chances of making the same kind of mistake in future?
- If verbal, why was the wrong answer so tempting? why did it look like it might be right? (be as explicit as possible) Why did the right answer seem wrong? what made it so tempting to cross off the right answer? why were those things actually okay - what was my error in thinking that they were wrong? (it's a good idea to do this exercise even if you got the question right - pick the wrong answer you think is most tempting and go through the exercise.)
- if you spent too much time, why? specifically, which part of the problem and what caused you to spend the extra time? did that extra time help? did that extra time hurt on a later problem? (if you spent more than 30sec over, the answer is yes, even if you got this problem right) how did that extra time hurt? specifically, where did you then not have enough time?
- if you spent too little time, why? were you rushing b/c you were behind? why were you behind; on which ones did you spend too much time? or did you think the problem was easy and you didn't need that much time? how often did you make mistakes on those "easy" problems on which you felt you didn't need full time? (On problems like that, you should make almost no mistakes - 95%+ accuracy. So if it's anything lower than that, you're hurting yourself by choosing to go fast when you think a problem is really easy.)
Get the idea? :)
Stacey Koprince
Instructor
Director, Content & Curriculum
ManhattanPrep