Manhhiep, it's fine if you post altered versions of the questions, but you may begin to notice a slowdown in our responses.
Once a free forum user (i.e., a forum user who has not purchased any courses or materials from us) surpasses a certain quantity or frequency of posts, we'll begin to limit the number of responses to that person's posts, just to keep the forum fair for other users.
manhhiep2509 Wrote:Hello.
My question relates to question VSC002367 in GMAT PREP.
(1) a study showed that A had happened <correct>
(2) a study showed the happening of A <incorrect>
Do the two sentences have the same meaning?
The sentence (2) seems not to say that A happened in reality.
Thank you.
These are fundamentally different.
In "xxxx had ___ed", xxxx is the
subject.
In "the ___ of xxxx", xxxx is the
object.
In this construction, "___" will be a dedicated noun form, if such a thing exists. (For instance,
destruction would be in the blank rather than
destroying.) If no such noun exists, then the __ing form is used.
E.g.,
Lisa had won... --> used if Lisa won something (a prize, a competition, whatever)
On the other hand,
the winning of Lisa would be a story about how someone (e.g., Lisa's husband) actually
won Lisa. Lisa is the object.
You can't "happen something", of course, so "the happening of ___" is a nonsense construction.