Is "explanation" a conclusion in "describe the role" CR question?
I did the 89th CR question from OG13. The 2nd bold-face is a premise that supports the conclusion. However, D, a wrong option, says the second bold-face gives the explanation that the argument seeks to establish.
Thus, I thought maybe D is wrong because the 2nd bold-face is just a premise, it cannot be a explanation.
Am I right?